The Common Law Right to Travel in detail

The Common Law Right to Travel in detail

Many people asked me NOT to write this, however I’ve come to the opinion that it’s time this issue was examined in detail and the case law you’ll need, should you get into trouble exercising your ‘Right To Travel’, more fully explained.

Some of this information is readily available elsewhere, but the court cases the information was lifted from is not there, as often this kind of information is pushed around the internet without any real examination of the facts. To that end I’ve taken it upon myself to elaborate further and show you where you can find a wealth (literally!) of legal information for FREE.

Many people will have seen various videos on YouTube and elsewhere, regarding this issue. But precious few will have explained to you where you can get the ‘legal’ information you might need, especially if you want to avoid some time courtesy of Her Majesty’s Bed and Breakfast establishment’s scattered around the country!

I was influenced a very long time ago, by stories then circulating amongst friends of mine in the USA, about Charlie Sprinkle. More on Charlie can be found on my blog HERE Charlie has, sadly, passed away since I wrote that piece and I now feel I owe him a debt of gratitude for reminding me that, it’s often humble people from ordinary backgrounds that can affect the greatest change. So this article is inspired by Charlie Sprinkle.

Now, although this is dedicated to that great Californian champion, this article is aimed squarely at those people residing in the UK. Although, you can cite case law in a defence (and academic opinion) from almost anywhere.

The sources used for this piece include:-

bailii.org (British and Irish Legal Information Institute, a reference for many solicitors and law professionals in the UK), look up case law from almost anywhere in the world. Open to use by members of the public FREE.

legislation.gov.uk (the Governments’ own web site covering legal the full content of ‘statutes’ and ‘Acts’), covers legislation for Scotland, England, Ireland and Wales. Also FREE to use and extremely useful. I use it almost daily.

Halsburys Laws of England is another essential component in our quest for TRUTH, curently edited by Baron Mackay of Clashfern a Scot.

I urge you always to do your own research and the best place to start is by searching the database of Halsbury’s Laws of England here http://lexisweb.co.uk/guides/sources/halsbury-s-laws-of-england

The House of Lords, the UK parliament web site and many other sources (including YouTube) are useful too and these formed part of my overall research.

I will give you the exact case law, which you can then verify for yourselves that what I’ve put here is truthful.

Charlie Sprinkle’s entire court action is also available on-line, should my American friends wish to step-by-step follow his example, which is truly remarkable. See my earlier piece on Charlie and watch some videos of Charlie describing the process he used  HERE

Firstly, the case law you need to to study (in date order), are these:-

R v Donovan [1934] 2 KB 498 at 507, [1934] All ER Rep 207 at 210. In delivering the judgement of the Court of Criminal Appeal Swift J, said:-

“If an act is unlawful in the sense of being in itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendered lawful because the person to whose detriment it is done consents to it. No person can license another to commit a crime.”

Justice Swift is telling us that, driving without government documents such as licences, MOT’s etc., cannot be ‘of itself criminal’, as the government licences these acts and therefore they cannot be criminal.

This is still a leading case, as can be seen from this document which can be found on The House of Lords’ website:

 http://www.commonlii.org/in/journals/NLUDLRS/2011/8.pdf

Ex parte Lewis (1888) 21 Q.B.D. 191 Wills J. said in regard to public right of passage:-

“The only ‘dedication’ in the legal sense that we are aware of is that of a public right of passage, of which the legal description is a ‘right for all Her Majesty’s subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance.’ ”

 

This makes the point that you can travel freely and that you can pass without ‘let’ (to hinder or stand in the way of)  or ‘hindrance’ (obstruction). The phrase ‘without let or hindrance’, meaning, without impediment, something that is free to progress.

Read the whole piece in the context of the case at the House of Lords: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990304/jones01.htm

It’s often interesting to look up some of the other case law cited in a judgement too.

DPP v. Jones and Another [1999] Lord Irvine LC

“The law should not make unlawful what is commonplace and well accepted.”

Lord Irvine makes the point that, one day you were a farmer with a shotgun, the next you’re a criminal because you don’t have a license for it. (a license has been required since 1962). See http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/27

See this UK Parliament (House of Lords) document here for a full transcript of the case: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990304/jones01.htm

Interestingly, this article coincided with the News that, Khat is to become illegal in this country too (at the time of writing), so those people who have it in their possession from next week will become criminals!

These cases help our understanding of and help to define the ‘common law right to travel’ argument in the legal realm.

So there you have it, I hope that helps many people, including the Police and other law professionals themselves, as I’m sure many of then would rather be chasing/prosecuting real criminals.

Another common concern amongst many of you seems to be whether Solicitors act for you or the Courts… well this should help focus that argument and dispel another myth or two.

In the famous case of Batchelor -v- Pattison & Mackersy (1876) 3R914 which establishes that solicitors are officers of the court and owe the court various duties which can transcend duties owed to a client but generally when a counsel is employed the solicitor is bound to follow his instructions. In England the Rondel -v- Worley 1969 AC191 case established that solicitors “should not blindly follow counsel”.

This obviously has implications for questions of negligence when they arise in the context of the conduct of hearings. In the above case the client decided to sue his former solicitor in relation to his conduct of the trial claiming that his solicitor had been negligent. He advanced a human rights argument that he had been denied a fair trial because of negligence and claimed a miscarriage of justice had resulted. He did not aver that he would have been acquitted but for this negligence.

So there you have it, two myths dispelled for the price of one!

Many books on aspects of Law cost well over a £1,000 including Greens Litigation Styles and indeed ‘Halsbury’s Laws of England’ which costs a not inconsiderable sum of £10,100 for the latest 5th edition (at time of writing), yes, you read that correctly! See HERE. Yet we’re told that ignorance of the law is NO DEFENCE! How can we possibly understand the law when it’s prohibitively expensive to buy such books and they’re not available in my (or your), local library for the same reason? Of course this is a deliberate attempt to keep you in that state of ‘ignorance’, so that administrative courts can unlawfully steal your debt money.

By the way Lord Halsbury was a very interesting man and I’ll finish by quoting a piece from that excellent (though expensive!) work that bears his name:-

 “It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.”

 

So, even if you do get dragged to court over ‘alleged’  council tax, parking fines etc., you now know that administrative courts are unconstitutional and have no constitutional authority derived from parliament. They’re businesses, pure and simple. Don’t play their game.

I will be writing more on the contents of ‘Halsbury’s Laws of England’ soon, especially an in depth look at why there is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation (touched on in the above quote). Which means they can’t pursue you for Council Tax etc. I’ve stated many times, all taxes are voluntary! More on that coming soon, so look back.

In closing this article, you might want an understanding of the rules of OSCOLA (a guide to understanding and presenting/citing case law etc), by downloading the pdf quick guide HERE or a more in depth guide HERE

My end quote for this article is by LORD HALSBURY, HARDINGE STANLEY GIFFARD British statesman (1823 – 1921)

“My Lords, I have more than once had occasion to say that in construing a statute I believe the worst person to construe it is the person who is responsible for its draft.”
– 1902 Appeal Cases (p. 477)

Terms

This site is maintained by James-Neely: Gillan™ and his Sponsors.

You should be aware that the information on this website cannot be a substitute for legal advice – knowledge and understanding of the relevant law is important so that appropriate steps can be taken to safeguard the adult in any particular case.

By using this website you agree to be legally bound by the terms and conditions set out below. If you do not want to be bound by these terms please discontinue the use of this site.

This site is produced by James-Neely:Gillan™ and whilst seeking to ensure that the information published on the site is up-to-date and accurate, the information on the site does not constitute legal or professional advice and James-Neely:Gillan™ and his Sponsors cannot accept any liability for actions arising from its use.

Copyright © 2011 – 2014 Free The People™
This web site is generously supported by The Digital Network with low cost PREMIUM web hosting and many other facilities that would cost us far too much elsewhere.

What or who is the crown?

What or who is the crown?

Due to several court cases I’ve been involved with recently, as part of the ever-increasing amount of voluntary advocacy work I’ve undertaken (yes, voluntary, as I take no payments either in kind or through any advertising on the site), I’ve been asked that very question several times. The answer will amaze many of you and yet if you research the  matter further you will find the answer is there for all to see, but we just don’t question it.

So in an attempt to explain this interesting and little known fact (by the public at least), and to separate fact from fiction, I will give a concise explanation on ‘the crown’ and also refer you to the sources and references I used for this article.

I will be listing all my reference sources for each of my articles at the end of each feature, as a new method of encouraging my readers to research more themselves and thus have the confidence to argue their position from a better understanding of many real (and some contentious), authorities.

So, what or who is the crown? (This piece contains large parts of two article’s on this subject by two different authors that I read some years ago. I’ve since edited them together and added my own take on the matter, altering them both as a result. References to the original articles and the authors are listed below and additionally I’ve added new sources I’ve been reading recently and links in the text to the expanded original views by the respective authors of my earlier research. I’m aware that this is a departure from my own methods, but the writers of both views were already fascinating and well written and it seemed pretty pointless to write it again, as I’ve no new ‘slant’ to add).

“To the majority of people the words “Crown” and “City” in reference to London refer to the queen or the capital of England.” This is not the truth. The “City” is in fact a privately owned Corporation – or Sovereign State – occupying an irregular rectangle of 677 acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile ‘Greater London’ area.”  Des Griffin

As many of my own readers and followers are already aware, I believe the bankers took over the U.S. during the Roosevelt Administration (1901-1909), this is a view that’s widely held and many political and financial commentators have spoken out on the matter over the years since and many views on this turbulent period exist for your further edification, on the internet. Case law surrounding this period is also fascinating, especially with regards to the scope and depth of the deception by all those who were complicit in the betrayal of the people, by those elected to protect them!

When Rothschild front ‘J.P. Morgan’ controlled 25% of all American business, the stage was already set. In 1919, the Rothschild-dominated Bank of England planned to trick the United States into becoming a “British” colony again by joining the League of Nations. The League of the Nations, like the “British Empire”, was the bankers’ fiefdom, and this stratagem would merely formalize a colonial status which already existed. The League is in substance the Empire with America admitted on the same basis as other colonies at that time.

“Crown” refers to the owners of the Bank of England. Their identities are an official secret. According to E.C. Knuth (‘The Empire of “The City”: The Secret History of British Financial Power’ see references below), the “international financial oligarchy uses the allegoric ‘Crown’ as its symbol of power and has its headquarters in the ancient city of London… the giant Bank of England (which has no bank branches, unlike the Bank Of Scotland or Royal Bank of Scotland), a privately owned institution… is not subject to regulation by the British parliament and is in effect a sovereign world power.”

The Crown is the Inner City of London, which is an independent State in London (England) belonging to the Vatican system (who currently own wonga.com). It is a banking cartel which has a massive system around and beneath, which hides its true power. The City is in fact the Knights Templar Church, also known as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. The Temple grounds are also home to the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row.

The Crown Temple controls the Global ‘Legal’ system, including those in the United States, Canada, Australia, and much more; this is because all Bar Associations are franchises of the International Bar Association at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple based at Chancery Lane in London. All Bar Associations are franchises of the Crown and all Bar Attorneys/ Barristers throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though many may not be aware that this is what they are doing. Bar Association ‘licensed’ Solicitors / Barristers must keep to their Oath, Pledge and terms of allegiance to the Crown Temple if they are to be “called to the Bar” and work in the legal profession. The ruling Monarch is also subordinate to the Crown Temple, this as been so since the reign of King John in the 13th century when Royal Sovereignty was transferred to the Crown Temple and, through this, to the Roman Church. King John 1167-1216 is the key to this deception.

It was at the Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court in January 1215 that King John was faced with the demands of the French/English Barons in England (mainly French), to confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. When he signed the Magna Carta in 1215 history records this as an event that extended human freedom, but the real effect was very different, as we shall see. The governments of the USA, Canada, Australia (and more), are subsidiaries of the Crown Temple and so is the US Central Bank the Federal Reserve, as are all Central Banks on the Planet and including the IMF World Bank.

It also has its own courts, its own laws, its own flag and its own police force, separate from the metropolitan police. City (crown/corporation) Police drive red Police cars and their uniforms are slightly different from the Metropolitan Police.

City Of London Flag
City Of London Police

Flag Of England
Metropolitan Police

It houses the privatised Bank of England, Lloyd’s of London, the London stock exchange, all British banks, the branch offices of 385 foreign banks and 70 US banks, as well as Fleet Street’s newspaper and publishing monopolies. It is also the headquarters for British Freemasonry.

It has a council of 12 members who rule the corporation under the lord mayor. The lord mayor and his/her 12 member council serve as proxies or representatives who sit-in for some of the worlds wealthiest, most powerful banking families.

When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms. The Queen bows to the Mayor only in the city. Outside of the city of London the Mayor bows to her.

See more on this subject HERE

The City of London is the only part of Britain over which parliament has no authority. In one respect at least the Corporation acts as the superior body: it imposes on the House of Commons a figure called the Remembrancer: an official lobbyist who sits behind the Speaker’s chair and ensures that, whatever our elected representatives might think, the City’s rights and privileges are protected.

In 1886, Andrew Carnegie wrote that, “six or seven men can plunge the nation into war without consulting Parliament at all.” Vincent Vickers, a director of the Bank of England from 1910-1919, blamed the Corporation/City for the wars of the world.

The City therefore, is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is often referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth, because it is!

You may want to get a view on what ‘crown dependencies’ are, see HERE for additional information on this matter see references at the end of the article.

In the nineteenth century, over 90% of the world’s trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world’s oceans!

The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown’s commerce and the Crown’s wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.

The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is composed of four Inns of Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln’s Inn and Gray’s Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar.

The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.

The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter ‘S,’ denotes a legal entity of the Crown. Which is why in all my articles on the federal states of America, I differentiate between them with the use of capitalisation. Indeed the ens legis use of capitalisation of names is the most insidious practise of them all, as the con was harder to spot as a result of its widespread use in all manner of ‘legal’ documents.

At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfilment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a ‘colour of title.’ Colour of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.

The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.

Another method used to hoodwink natural persons is enfranchisement. Those Bank or Credit cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation. A ‘juristic personality’ has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown. The juristic/juridical person is now well established in law. Check out ‘juristic person’ HERE.

These invisible contracts include: birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver’s licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by Scottish (or American judges). If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract. Indeed in Scotland a whole contract can be implied and some terms and conditions added too!

Western colonization is widely taught in school history courses, so it need not be repeated here. One key aspect of the colonial period is generally omitted or skimmed over from the more basic history courses. This is the fact that all the Crown colonies were established on a corporate model with financial ties to the City of London – not the nation of England or Britain. The island of Britain is a crown colony, the City of London is not.

It’s no surprise that, the government controls the school curriculum, so you get taught what your supposed to believe from an early age, so that by the time you’ve reached maturity, you’ve accepted the generally held beliefs regarding our financial, legal and indeed our more general history. History belongs to the victors remember.

The directorate of the Crown, whoever they were, had no loyalty to any nation – they were, and are, devoted entirely to their philosophy which seeks absolute power over an earthly realm. For more than 250 years, the servants of the Crown brought untold wealth back from the colonies to the British Isles – for themselves: the population of the United Kingdom (English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh) received very little wealth even though they provided the tax base and the cannon fodder. Something that is particularly important to keep in mind during this week of Remembrance (when I wrote/edited this article). What did all those people who fought in these colonial  ‘wars’ really fight (and indeed die) for? How many knew their real purpose and why they were there and would they have so willingly gone if they new the real truth of their masters’ will?

The people were invaluable assets of the Crown, but they knew not what they served – and many still don’t. (None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who believe they are free). Historian Jeffrey Steinberg could be referring to the US, Canada and Australia when he writes, “England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, are today little more than slave plantations and social engineering laboratories, serving the needs of the Crown/City of London. Understand that there were many dissenting voices (including those of judges, politicians and financiers), but, they were merely written out of history – at least temporarily!

So next time you’ve been hoodwinked into acting as surety or guarantor for your legal fiction name, remember who exactly your paying a parking or speeding fine to (or some other ‘charge’ for money), it’s merely court ‘business’ get it?

More soon, thanks for reading: James of the family Gillan

Some of this content came from this article by Mark Owen: http://www.rense.com/general63/tcs.htm

Read more on all this HERE

Other Reference sources included:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crown

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Disraeli

Des Griffin – ‘Descent Into Slavery?’ This book can be purchased on Amazon HERE

E.C. Knoth – ‘The Empire of “The City”: The Secret History of British Financial Power’ This book can also be purchased on Amazon HERE

Frederick Morton  – The Rothschilds: Portrait of a Dynasty ISBN 1-56836-220-X )

Mark Owen – find him at http//:www.rense.com  (along with a raft of adverts and other ‘fun’ stuff!)

You might also want to read these sources:-

http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/QueenandCrowndependencies/QueenandCrowndependencies.aspx

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/crown/crwdep.htm

https://www.gov.uk/uk-treaties

http://collections.europarchive.org/tna/20080205132101/www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front%3Fpagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1044360168291

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/taxesandcrown.html

http://openeye.99k.org/The%20Crown.html

http://www.savethemales.ca/000426.html

This last reference is an interesting legal read: The Crown as Corporation – by Frederic Maitland 1901 – Law Quarterly Review 17 (1901) pp. 131-46.

http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/maitland/crowncor.mai

My end quote for this piece comes from Benjamin Disraeli

“So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes”.
–Disraeli, Prime Minister of England during Queen Victoria’s reign.

David Icke on the real meaning of the G-8 taxation ‘transparency’

David Icke on the real meaning of the G-8 taxation ‘transparency’

A quick post regarding what I and many others believe is the real agenda behind the recent #G8 summit, with regards to ‘taxation transparency’.

You may have heard of the term PRS – Problem, Reaction, Solution. Find out more, watch Davids video HERE

Check out more on the uncensored News by David and his team HERE

“Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).”
Ayn Rand

More articles coming soon, James-Neely: Gillan

 

Some Favourite Quotations

Words have the power to influence people and can resonate profoundly when the speaker strikes a chord that, moves you to take some action. I write this blog in the hope that, what you read here, will motivate you to take some positive action in your own life.

I particularly like the following quote:

“As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of change in the air – however slight – lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.” – Justice of the Supreme Court, William O. Douglas

I also like many of the powerful and deeply profound words of wisdom (in the pursuit of freedom), that are attributed to such luminaries as, Mahatma Gandhi, Buddha, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, John Quincy Adams and Martin Luther King amongst many others.

Another that resonates with me is this:

“A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic.” –Dresden James

Another in this short piece on inspirational quotations that I greatly admire:

“I am only one; but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but I still can do something. I will not refuse to do the something I can do.” – Helen Keller

Freedom is just about as difficult as you think it is going to be. I sincerely hope you start your own journey on the protection of it today, especially since it’s been announced here in the UK today that, we are all going to have our Facebook, Google and Twitter accounts monitored by the Government. This will also include the monitoring of emails and Internet usage and what we search for on line. It’s also proposed that, the use of CCTV to monitor our every move, be further increased.

We are supposed to be a FREE Nation. Big Brother is definitely watching you now…

“What luck for rulers, that men do not think.” –Adolph Hitler

Final words

‘Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you.'”

Steven Seagal’s message to the world

I’m not usually a fan of Steven Seagal films, but this ‘movie’ is in a different league. In fact it’s very much my own thinking or conscience if you like, eloquently spoken by a kindred spirit. Check it out for yourselves, you know he makes sense, deep down you also know he’s right, so speak out on the subject. There’s more of us than you think and at all levels of society.

Local elections took place here in Scotland recently, and despite the justified fears about a record low turnout in Scotland’s council elections on 3 May (although there are no plans to publish the true figure before September), where it’s likely to be far less than 40% of the eligible population. Yet politician’s would have you believe that, they have a ‘majority’ the ‘mandate’ or will of the people. That, somehow, they can introduce ‘laws’ or be compelled by big business or other vested interests, to introduce all kinds of ‘legislation’ which is often against the true will of the people and indeed is designed to enslave you not free you.

In every election from now on, can I urge you all to vote for the ‘independent’ at every election and to do this in large numbers, completely avoid the ‘party’ politicians, then we should see some interesting results. Now that I’d love to see!

Always remember that your ‘CONSENT’ to any Act or Statute that a government attempts to ‘foist’ upon you, requires your INDIVIDUAL consent, not some blanket consent, that too many people assume ‘consent of the people’ means.

THE UK GOVERNMENT CORPORATION

In response to those people who’ve requested further information regarding the UK GOVERNMENT’S ‘CORPORATE’ status, can I suggest that you research more on this matter yourselves at the public record of Parliament by visiting HANSARD.

For more on the operations of the United Kingdom Corporation, look up these references:

1 HC Deb 22 October 1940 vol 365 c942W (Mr. Craven-Ellis & Mr. Johnstone)
– HANSARD 1803–2005 ? 1940s ? 1940 ? October 1940 ? 22 October 1940 ? Written Answers (Commons)
2 HC Deb 29 July 1943 vol 391 c1819W (Mr. Barstow & Captain Waterhouse)
– HANSARD 1803–2005 ? 1940s ? 1943 ? July 1943 ? 29 July 1943 ? Written Answers (Commons)
3 HL Deb 03 May 1944 vol 131 cc616-21 (The Earl of Carlisle)
– HANSARD 1803–2005 ? 1940s ? 1944 ? May 1944 ? 3 May 1944 ? Lords Sitting
4 HL Deb 24 February 1949 vol 160 cc1168-84 (Viscount Swinton)
– HANSARD 1803–2005 ? 1940s ? 1949 ? February 1949 ? 24 February 1949 ? Lords Sitting

So, do you still think the Government has ‘never’ been a CORPORATION? Enjoy!

Common Law Freedoms. Article 6

Common Law – Article 6
Mirrored from an original post by me elsewhere and originally Posted on February 24, 2012
Common Law Freedoms (Constitutional freedoms)

To help you in your own quest, I’ve put links on my main web site to many impeccable sources (including government, university, educational, lawful and legal sources), and urge you check this all out for yourselves. My main web site can be found here www.freethepeople.co.uk. Perhaps, you will even join me in ‘LAWFUL REBELLION’ until such time that our demands are met for a fair and just society, with respect for its people, its representatives and its judiciary.

I would like to recommend that you please (my US friends particularly), check out the videos below, in order to understand exactly what you need to know. Watch Charlie Sprinkle himself explain to you, what you Californians should’ve been doing for years! Think of the money you would’ve saved! All those poor Californians ‘mugged’ by your own Government, report them all to the FBI.

This video (below) explains the position on ‘commercial’ activity and driving.

Now watch Charlie…

When is a statue of this man going to appear in California? Overlooking the highway would be appropriate in my opinion!